← Back to Blog

CWL Cloud Breaker — SSRF → EC2 Role Impact

Cloud Security

Executive summary: I hacked a cloud service where a vulnerable EC2-hosted web app with a server-side fetch feature exposed the instance metadata surface via SSRF, allowing temporary IAM role credentials to be disclosed. The chain illustrates how a tiny input-validation slip can become a catastrophic cloud identity compromise.

This document covers: reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation characterization (redacted), credential validation (redacted), pivot scenarios (conceptual), detection opportunities, remediation playbook, and a prioritized hardening checklist. All live identifiers are replaced with REDACTED_* tokens.

⚠️ Lab Context & Safety Posture
  • Environment: Isolated lab account / sandbox provided by CyberWarFare Labs
  • Scope: Single EC2 instance + attached IAM role; no production systems touched
  • Controls: Logging enabled, ephemeral resources, pre-agreed rollback plan
  • Redaction policy: All IPs, account IDs, role names, secret material and precise metadata addresses replaced

1) Reconnaissance — Starting with Low-Hanging Fruit

Goals: find public storage, historical artifacts, and repo leakage that point to endpoints or keys.

Actions (redacted / conceptual):

  • S3-style probing of common bucket naming patterns: results returned HTTP_STATUS_NOT_FOUND for the tested names
  • Attempted Wayback/archival harvesting — tooling absent in the specific lab VM; method noted for future runs
  • GitHub OSINT: discovered repository containing cloud service account artifacts — for a different provider (non-AWS)

Notes & Analysis: Multi-cloud leakage is a real foot-gun; finding keys for a different cloud often indicates engineering hygiene issues and could enable lateral pivot in cross-cloud setups. No public buckets were found, so we pivoted to host discovery.

2) Discovery — Find the Running Asset

Method: iterate lab subnet, perform HTTP/host checks (non-destructive), and fingerprint the web service headers.

Findings (redacted):

  • A host responded at REDACTED_IP with HTTP 200 and server signature resembling Apache/REDACTED_VER (Ubuntu)
  • Additional headers indicated typical LAMP stack responses; webroot served a simple app UI

Verification: Whois/ASN lookup mapping confirmed the IP was allocated to REDACTED_CLOUD_PROVIDER. This validated an EC2-hosted hypothesis and focused the cloud pivot analysis.

3) Application Analysis — The Juicy Artifact

Observed assets (redacted):

  • http://REDACTED_IP/update.html — contained a form with fields: url, date, ip, organization
  • Form POSTs were handled by process.php (server-side script). App echoing/processing behavior suggested server-side retrieval of user-supplied ip/url content
🎯 Key Observation

The ip parameter is likely used in a fetch routine (fetch, curl, file_get_contents(), etc.) — classic SSRF surface if not validated.

4) SSRF Characterization

Threat model recap: If a process on the instance accepts a user-supplied URL and performs an outbound HTTP fetch, that process can be induced to retrieve internal-only endpoints (e.g., cloud metadata) — which exposes identity material.

Safe validation flow (conceptual):

  1. Submit a lab-controlled external URL that returns a known marker
  2. Confirm that marker appears in the application's response/logs — indicates server-side fetch capability
  3. Once SSRF behavior is confirmed, escalate only within lab rules to verify internal reachability

Result: SSRF behavior confirmed for ip parameter; application could fetch internal services reachable from the instance.

5) Credential Extraction

What was observed (sanitized):

JSON Response (Redacted)
{
  "AccessKeyId": "REDACTED_KEY",
  "SecretAccessKey": "REDACTED_SECRET",
  "Token": "REDACTED_SESSION_TOKEN",
  "Expiration": "REDACTED_EXPIRATION_TIMESTAMP"
}

Important note: The credentials were temporary and associated with the EC2 instance role REDACTED_ROLE. No permanent long-lived credentials were discovered in this chain.

IAM Credential Disclosure via SSRF CRITICAL

Exposure of temporary IAM credentials that map to an instance-attached role is a critical identity disclosure. These credentials can be used to perform any action the role permits.

6) Post-Exploitation Verification

Purpose: Ensure the extracted credentials are real and enumerate what the role could access, so defenders can prioritize remediations.

Conceptual checks performed:

  • Use the extracted temporary credentials to call a get-caller-identity-equivalent to verify principal identity
  • Enumerate a minimal set of permitted APIs to determine blast radius

Outcome: Credentials were valid and capable of performing actions allowed by the instance role.

7) Blast Radius & Pivot Scenarios

From the role's permissions, an adversary could conceptually:

  • Enumerate object stores and download objects if read permission exists
  • List compute resources and discover other instances or functions to attack
  • Create ephemeral compute (if allowed) to achieve persistence
  • Access secrets/parameter stores to obtain further credentials
  • Chain trust relationships by using permissive role policies
Vector Ease Impact
Read S3-like buckets High High
Assume cross-account role Medium High
Deploy serverless backdoor Low High
Exfiltrate DB snapshots Medium High

8) Detection Playbook

Build these rules into your SIEM/IDS/WAF:

CloudTrail / Audit-based:

  • Alert: EventName == "GetCallerIdentity" originating from an instance principal that doesn't match deployment automation accounts → Critical
  • Alert: AssumeRole events where source is an instance principal and not a known automation identity → High

Network / Host-based:

  • Alert: Outbound HTTP(S) from web server process to internal-only CIDR or metadata address → Critical
  • Alert: Web processes performing high-frequency outbound fetches to many different hosts → Medium

Application / WAF:

  • Rule: Block requests containing internal-only URL patterns in parameters used for server-side fetches
  • Rule: Rate-limit and challenge forms that accept external URLs

9) Prioritized Remediation & Hardening

Priority 1 — Immediate (minutes to hours):

  1. Enforce metadata protection: require IMDSv2 or equivalent session-based metadata requirement
  2. Lock down instance IAM roles: change role policies to least privilege; remove broad * actions
  3. Input allowlist: stop server-side fetches to arbitrary hosts — implement strict allowlists

Priority 2 — Short term (hours to days):

  1. Add WAF rules to detect and block SSRF-like input patterns
  2. Rotate any exposed credentials and invalidate sessions
  3. Improve logging to detect future similar attempts

Priority 3 — Strategic (days to weeks):

  1. CI/CD secret scanning: implement automated scanning for leaked secrets
  2. Network segmentation: limit egress from web tiers to required endpoints only
  3. Threat modeling & least-privilege review across roles and policies

10) Incident Response Checklist

If you detect this in production:

  1. Isolate: limit the instance's network egress and isolate the workload
  2. Rotate: revoke/rotate exposed credentials and force session invalidation
  3. Audit: collect CloudTrail logs and host logs to build a timeline
  4. Contain: enforce IMDS protections and deploy emergency WAF rule
  5. Eradicate: remove the vulnerable code path, patch the app, and redeploy
  6. Remediate: least-privilege review and rotation of roles/keys system-wide
  7. Review: run tabletop to update runbooks and detection rules

Lessons Learned

  • SSRF is an identity problem in cloud contexts — input validation alone is not enough if the instance can reach identity endpoints
  • Make metadata access harder, not easier: IMDSv2-like protections + network egress controls
  • Logging + SIEM rules win investigations — detect the reconnaissance before the extraction
  • Developer hygiene matters: secrets in repos, test keys, and permissive IAM are consistent root causes

Shoutout: CyberWarFare Labs — thanks for the range practice.

🔐 Security Disclaimer

All testing was conducted in authorized lab environments with proper scope and controls. Never test systems without explicit authorization.