CWL Cloud Breaker — SSRF → EC2 Role Impact

Cloud Security

Executive summary (short & tasty): I hacked a cloud service where a vulnerable EC2-hosted web app with a server-side fetch feature exposed the instance metadata surface via SSRF, allowing temporary IAM role credentials to be disclosed. The chain illustrates how a tiny input-validation slip can become a catastrophic cloud identity compromise.

This document covers: reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation characterization (redacted), credential validation (redacted), pivot scenarios (conceptual), detection opportunities, remediation playbook, and a prioritized hardening checklist. All live identifiers are replaced with REDACTED_* tokens.

Lab Context & Safety Posture

  • Environment: Isolated lab account / sandbox provided by CyberWarFare Labs
  • Scope: Single EC2 instance + attached IAM role; no production systems touched
  • Controls: Logging enabled, ephemeral resources, pre-agreed rollback plan
  • Redaction policy: All IPs, account IDs, role names, secret material and precise metadata addresses replaced with REDACTED_*

Table of Contents

  • 1) Reconnaissance — S3, Wayback, GitHub
  • 2) Discovery — IP scanning, header fingerprinting
  • 3) Application analysis — forms, params, behaviors
  • 4) SSRF characterization — safe validation approach
  • 5) Credential extraction — redacted artifact description
  • 6) Post-exploitation verification
  • 7) Blast radius & pivot strategies
  • 8) Detection playbook
  • 9) Remediation & hardening
  • 10) Tactical defensive templates
  • 11) Lab replication guidance
  • 12) Incident response checklist
  • 13) Timeline & artifact catalog
  • 14) Lessons learned

1) Reconnaissance — Starting with Low-Hanging Fruit

Goals: find public storage, historical artifacts, and repo leakage that point to endpoints or keys.

Actions (redacted / conceptual):

  • S3-style probing of common bucket naming patterns: results returned HTTP_STATUS_NOT_FOUND for the tested names
  • Attempted Wayback/archival harvesting — tooling absent in the specific lab VM; method noted for future runs
  • GitHub OSINT: discovered https://github.com/REDACTED_ORG/REDACTED_REPO containing cloud service account artifacts — for a different provider (non-AWS)

Notes & Analysis: Multi-cloud leakage is a real foot-gun; finding keys for a different cloud often indicates engineering hygiene issues and could enable lateral pivot in cross-cloud setups. No public buckets were found for standard name patterns, so we pivoted to host discovery.

2) Discovery — Find the Running Asset (IP-based)

Method: iterate lab subnet, perform HTTP/host checks (non-destructive), and fingerprint the web service headers.

Findings (redacted):

  • A host responded at REDACTED_IP with HTTP 200 and server signature resembling Apache/REDACTED_VER (Ubuntu)
  • Additional headers indicated typical LAMP stack responses; webroot served a simple app UI

Verification of hosting provider (redacted): Whois/ASN lookup mapping confirmed the IP was allocated to REDACTED_CLOUD_PROVIDER. This validated an EC2-hosted hypothesis and focused the cloud pivot analysis.

3) Application Analysis — The Juicy Artifact: update.html + process.php

Observed assets (redacted):

  • http://REDACTED_IP/update.html — contained a form with fields: url, date, ip, organization
  • Form POSTs were handled by process.php (server-side script). App echoing/processing behavior suggested server-side retrieval of user-supplied ip/url content

Important observation: The ip parameter is likely used in a fetch routine (fetch, curl, file_get_contents(), etc.) — classic SSRF surface if not validated.

Safe testing approach used: Observed application responses to harmless, external test URLs to confirm retrieval behavior. No internal metadata queries were performed without proper authorizations (details redacted).

4) SSRF Characterization — How We Safely Tested for Server-Side Fetching

Threat model recap: If a process on the instance accepts a user-supplied URL and performs an outbound HTTP fetch, that process can be induced to retrieve internal-only endpoints (e.g., cloud metadata) — which exposes identity material.

Safe, redacted validation flow (conceptual):

  1. Submit a lab-controlled external URL that returns a known marker
  2. Confirm that marker appears in the application's response/logs — indicates server-side fetch capability
  3. Once SSRF behavior is confirmed, escalate only within lab rules to verify internal reachability to internal-only endpoints

Result: SSRF behavior confirmed for ip parameter; application could fetch internal services reachable from the instance.

5) Credential Extraction — Artifact Description (Redacted)

What was observed (sanitized):

{ "AccessKeyId": "REDACTED_KEY", "SecretAccessKey": "REDACTED_SECRET", "Token": "REDACTED_SESSION_TOKEN", "Expiration": "REDACTED_EXPIRATION_TIMESTAMP" }

Important note: The credentials were temporary and associated with the EC2 instance role REDACTED_ROLE. No permanent long-lived credentials were discovered in this chain.

Security classification: High — exposure of temporary IAM credentials that map to an instance-attached role is a critical identity disclosure.

6) Post-Exploitation Verification — Conceptual Validation & Safe Checks

(Everything redacted and conceptual — performed in-lab only.)

Purpose of verification: ensure the extracted credentials are real and to enumerate what the role could access, so defenders can prioritize remediations.

Conceptual checks performed:

  • Use the extracted temporary credentials to call a get-caller-identity-equivalent (redacted) to verify principal identity and role assumption shape
  • Enumerate a minimal set of permitted APIs to determine blast radius (listing accessible buckets, reading permitted object metadata, etc.) — all within lab authorization

Outcome: credentials were valid and capable of performing actions allowed by the instance role.

7) Blast Radius & Pivot Scenarios (Conceptual — No Live Actions)

From the role's permissions, an adversary could conceptually:

  • Enumerate object stores and download objects if read permission exists
  • List compute resources and discover other instances or functions to attack
  • Create ephemeral compute (if allowed) to achieve persistence
  • Access secrets/parameter stores (if permitted) to obtain further credentials
  • Chain trust relationships by using permissive role policies (conceptual escalation)

Risk Matrix (Redacted Labels):

Vector Ease (Low/Med/High) Impact (Low/Med/High)
Read S3-like buckets High High
Assume cross-account role Medium High
Deploy serverless backdoor Low High
Exfiltrate DB snapshots Medium High

8) Detection Playbook — What Defenders Should Implement Now

Below are concrete detection ideas (safe to implement, non-actionable). Build these rules into your SIEM/IDS/WAF:

CloudTrail / Audit-based:

  • Alert: EventName == "GetCallerIdentity" originating from an instance principal that doesn't match deployment automation accounts → Critical
  • Alert: AssumeRole events where source is an instance principal and not a known automation identity → High

Network / Host-based:

  • Alert: Outbound HTTP(S) from web server process to internal-only CIDR or metadata address → Critical
  • Alert: Web processes performing high-frequency outbound fetches to many different hosts (abnormal for typical app behavior) → Medium

Application / WAF:

  • Rule: Block requests containing internal-only URL patterns or IP ranges in parameters that are used server-side for fetches
  • Rule: Rate-limit and challenge (CAPTCHA) for forms that accept external URLs

9) Prioritized Remediation & Hardening Playbook

Priority 1 — Immediate (minutes to hours):

  1. Enforce metadata protection: require platform metadata service protections (session-based metadata requirement / IMDSv2 or equivalent)
  2. Lock down instance IAM roles: change role policies to least privilege; remove broad * actions
  3. Input allowlist: stop server-side fetches to arbitrary hosts — implement strict allowlists for any external fetcher feature

Priority 2 — Short term (hours to days):

  1. Add WAF rules to detect and block SSRF-like input patterns
  2. Rotate any exposed credentials and invalidate sessions (if applicable)
  3. Improve logging to detect future similar attempts (host, app, cloud audit pipeline)

Priority 3 — Strategic (days to weeks):

  1. CI/CD secret scanning: implement automated scanning for leaked secrets in repos and artifact stores
  2. Network segmentation: limit egress from web tiers to required endpoints only
  3. Threat modeling & least-privilege review across roles and policies

10) Tactical Defensive Templates (Redacted & Safe to Copy)

Example: Minimal IAM policy for instance role (CONCEPTUAL)

{ "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Sid": "AllowReadOnlySpecificBucket", "Effect": "Allow", "Action": [ "s3:GetObject", "s3:ListBucket" ], "Resource": [ "arn:aws:s3:::REDACTED_BUCKET", "arn:aws:s3:::REDACTED_BUCKET/*" ] } ] }

WAF pseudo-rule (conceptual): If request body contains a parameter used for server fetch AND value resolves to internal-only hostnames/IPs or metadata-like patterns → block + alert.

12) Incident Response Checklist (Fast, Practical)

If you detect this in production (don't panic, act):

  1. Isolate: limit the instance's network egress and isolate the workload
  2. Rotate: revoke/rotate exposed credentials and force session invalidation
  3. Audit: collect CloudTrail logs and host logs to build a timeline of requests by the compromised principal
  4. Contain: enforce IMDS protections and deploy emergency WAF rule to block SSRF-like inputs
  5. Eradicate: remove the vulnerable code path, patch the app, and redeploy with improved validation
  6. Remediate: least-privilege review and rotation of roles/keys system-wide as needed
  7. Review: run tabletop to update runbooks and detection rules

14) Lessons Learned — Another Way of Saying "Don't Be Sloppy"

  • SSRF is an identity problem in cloud contexts — input validation alone is not enough if the instance can reach identity endpoints
  • Make metadata access harder, not easier: IMDSv2-like protections + network egress controls
  • Logging + SIEM rules win investigations — detect the reconnaissance before the extraction
  • Developer hygiene matters: secrets in repos, test keys, and permissive IAM are consistent root causes

Shoutout: CyberWarFare Labs — thanks for the range practice.

All testing conducted in authorized lab environments with proper scope and controls.