CWL Cloud Breaker — SSRF → EC2 Role Impact
Cloud SecurityExecutive summary (short & tasty): I hacked a cloud service where a vulnerable EC2-hosted web app with a server-side fetch feature exposed the instance metadata surface via SSRF, allowing temporary IAM role credentials to be disclosed. The chain illustrates how a tiny input-validation slip can become a catastrophic cloud identity compromise.
This document covers: reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation characterization (redacted), credential validation (redacted), pivot scenarios (conceptual), detection opportunities, remediation playbook, and a prioritized hardening checklist. All live identifiers are replaced with REDACTED_* tokens.
Lab Context & Safety Posture
- Environment: Isolated lab account / sandbox provided by CyberWarFare Labs
- Scope: Single EC2 instance + attached IAM role; no production systems touched
- Controls: Logging enabled, ephemeral resources, pre-agreed rollback plan
- Redaction policy: All IPs, account IDs, role names, secret material and precise metadata addresses replaced with REDACTED_*
Table of Contents
- 1) Reconnaissance — S3, Wayback, GitHub
- 2) Discovery — IP scanning, header fingerprinting
- 3) Application analysis — forms, params, behaviors
- 4) SSRF characterization — safe validation approach
- 5) Credential extraction — redacted artifact description
- 6) Post-exploitation verification
- 7) Blast radius & pivot strategies
- 8) Detection playbook
- 9) Remediation & hardening
- 10) Tactical defensive templates
- 11) Lab replication guidance
- 12) Incident response checklist
- 13) Timeline & artifact catalog
- 14) Lessons learned
1) Reconnaissance — Starting with Low-Hanging Fruit
Goals: find public storage, historical artifacts, and repo leakage that point to endpoints or keys.
Actions (redacted / conceptual):
- S3-style probing of common bucket naming patterns: results returned HTTP_STATUS_NOT_FOUND for the tested names
- Attempted Wayback/archival harvesting — tooling absent in the specific lab VM; method noted for future runs
- GitHub OSINT: discovered https://github.com/REDACTED_ORG/REDACTED_REPO containing cloud service account artifacts — for a different provider (non-AWS)
Notes & Analysis: Multi-cloud leakage is a real foot-gun; finding keys for a different cloud often indicates engineering hygiene issues and could enable lateral pivot in cross-cloud setups. No public buckets were found for standard name patterns, so we pivoted to host discovery.
2) Discovery — Find the Running Asset (IP-based)
Method: iterate lab subnet, perform HTTP/host checks (non-destructive), and fingerprint the web service headers.
Findings (redacted):
- A host responded at REDACTED_IP with HTTP 200 and server signature resembling Apache/REDACTED_VER (Ubuntu)
- Additional headers indicated typical LAMP stack responses; webroot served a simple app UI
Verification of hosting provider (redacted): Whois/ASN lookup mapping confirmed the IP was allocated to REDACTED_CLOUD_PROVIDER. This validated an EC2-hosted hypothesis and focused the cloud pivot analysis.
3) Application Analysis — The Juicy Artifact: update.html + process.php
Observed assets (redacted):
- http://REDACTED_IP/update.html — contained a form with fields: url, date, ip, organization
- Form POSTs were handled by process.php (server-side script). App echoing/processing behavior suggested server-side retrieval of user-supplied ip/url content
Important observation: The ip parameter is likely used in a fetch routine (fetch, curl, file_get_contents(), etc.) — classic SSRF surface if not validated.
Safe testing approach used: Observed application responses to harmless, external test URLs to confirm retrieval behavior. No internal metadata queries were performed without proper authorizations (details redacted).
4) SSRF Characterization — How We Safely Tested for Server-Side Fetching
Threat model recap: If a process on the instance accepts a user-supplied URL and performs an outbound HTTP fetch, that process can be induced to retrieve internal-only endpoints (e.g., cloud metadata) — which exposes identity material.
Safe, redacted validation flow (conceptual):
- Submit a lab-controlled external URL that returns a known marker
- Confirm that marker appears in the application's response/logs — indicates server-side fetch capability
- Once SSRF behavior is confirmed, escalate only within lab rules to verify internal reachability to internal-only endpoints
Result: SSRF behavior confirmed for ip parameter; application could fetch internal services reachable from the instance.
5) Credential Extraction — Artifact Description (Redacted)
What was observed (sanitized):
{
"AccessKeyId": "REDACTED_KEY",
"SecretAccessKey": "REDACTED_SECRET",
"Token": "REDACTED_SESSION_TOKEN",
"Expiration": "REDACTED_EXPIRATION_TIMESTAMP"
}
Important note: The credentials were temporary and associated with the EC2 instance role REDACTED_ROLE. No permanent long-lived credentials were discovered in this chain.
Security classification: High — exposure of temporary IAM credentials that map to an instance-attached role is a critical identity disclosure.
6) Post-Exploitation Verification — Conceptual Validation & Safe Checks
(Everything redacted and conceptual — performed in-lab only.)
Purpose of verification: ensure the extracted credentials are real and to enumerate what the role could access, so defenders can prioritize remediations.
Conceptual checks performed:
- Use the extracted temporary credentials to call a get-caller-identity-equivalent (redacted) to verify principal identity and role assumption shape
- Enumerate a minimal set of permitted APIs to determine blast radius (listing accessible buckets, reading permitted object metadata, etc.) — all within lab authorization
Outcome: credentials were valid and capable of performing actions allowed by the instance role.
7) Blast Radius & Pivot Scenarios (Conceptual — No Live Actions)
From the role's permissions, an adversary could conceptually:
- Enumerate object stores and download objects if read permission exists
- List compute resources and discover other instances or functions to attack
- Create ephemeral compute (if allowed) to achieve persistence
- Access secrets/parameter stores (if permitted) to obtain further credentials
- Chain trust relationships by using permissive role policies (conceptual escalation)
Risk Matrix (Redacted Labels):
| Vector | Ease (Low/Med/High) | Impact (Low/Med/High) |
|---|---|---|
| Read S3-like buckets | High | High |
| Assume cross-account role | Medium | High |
| Deploy serverless backdoor | Low | High |
| Exfiltrate DB snapshots | Medium | High |
8) Detection Playbook — What Defenders Should Implement Now
Below are concrete detection ideas (safe to implement, non-actionable). Build these rules into your SIEM/IDS/WAF:
CloudTrail / Audit-based:
- Alert: EventName == "GetCallerIdentity" originating from an instance principal that doesn't match deployment automation accounts → Critical
- Alert: AssumeRole events where source is an instance principal and not a known automation identity → High
Network / Host-based:
- Alert: Outbound HTTP(S) from web server process to internal-only CIDR or metadata address → Critical
- Alert: Web processes performing high-frequency outbound fetches to many different hosts (abnormal for typical app behavior) → Medium
Application / WAF:
- Rule: Block requests containing internal-only URL patterns or IP ranges in parameters that are used server-side for fetches
- Rule: Rate-limit and challenge (CAPTCHA) for forms that accept external URLs
9) Prioritized Remediation & Hardening Playbook
Priority 1 — Immediate (minutes to hours):
- Enforce metadata protection: require platform metadata service protections (session-based metadata requirement / IMDSv2 or equivalent)
- Lock down instance IAM roles: change role policies to least privilege; remove broad * actions
- Input allowlist: stop server-side fetches to arbitrary hosts — implement strict allowlists for any external fetcher feature
Priority 2 — Short term (hours to days):
- Add WAF rules to detect and block SSRF-like input patterns
- Rotate any exposed credentials and invalidate sessions (if applicable)
- Improve logging to detect future similar attempts (host, app, cloud audit pipeline)
Priority 3 — Strategic (days to weeks):
- CI/CD secret scanning: implement automated scanning for leaked secrets in repos and artifact stores
- Network segmentation: limit egress from web tiers to required endpoints only
- Threat modeling & least-privilege review across roles and policies
10) Tactical Defensive Templates (Redacted & Safe to Copy)
Example: Minimal IAM policy for instance role (CONCEPTUAL)
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "AllowReadOnlySpecificBucket",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::REDACTED_BUCKET",
"arn:aws:s3:::REDACTED_BUCKET/*"
]
}
]
}
WAF pseudo-rule (conceptual): If request body contains a parameter used for server fetch AND value resolves to internal-only hostnames/IPs or metadata-like patterns → block + alert.
12) Incident Response Checklist (Fast, Practical)
If you detect this in production (don't panic, act):
- Isolate: limit the instance's network egress and isolate the workload
- Rotate: revoke/rotate exposed credentials and force session invalidation
- Audit: collect CloudTrail logs and host logs to build a timeline of requests by the compromised principal
- Contain: enforce IMDS protections and deploy emergency WAF rule to block SSRF-like inputs
- Eradicate: remove the vulnerable code path, patch the app, and redeploy with improved validation
- Remediate: least-privilege review and rotation of roles/keys system-wide as needed
- Review: run tabletop to update runbooks and detection rules
14) Lessons Learned — Another Way of Saying "Don't Be Sloppy"
- SSRF is an identity problem in cloud contexts — input validation alone is not enough if the instance can reach identity endpoints
- Make metadata access harder, not easier: IMDSv2-like protections + network egress controls
- Logging + SIEM rules win investigations — detect the reconnaissance before the extraction
- Developer hygiene matters: secrets in repos, test keys, and permissive IAM are consistent root causes
Shoutout: CyberWarFare Labs — thanks for the range practice.
All testing conducted in authorized lab environments with proper scope and controls.